Encounter Killings and Custodial Deaths in India (2026 Legal Guide) — Rules & Requirements

Last verified:

Source: PUCL v. State of Maharashtra, (2014) 10 SCC 635; D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal, (1997) 1 SCC 416; BNSS, 2023, s. 196; Constitution of India, Article 21; Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993

About this article

Sourced from Indian central (Union) law — Constitution of India, central Acts of Parliament, and Supreme Court decisions. State-level information reflects each state's own Acts and High Court rulings. Written in plain language for general understanding — this is educational content, not legal advice. Our editorial standards

Indian Central Law

What is this right?

In People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. State of Maharashtra, (2014) 10 SCC 635, the Supreme Court laid down a 16-point binding protocol covering every police-encounter death — from FIR registration to mandatory magisterial inquiry to forensic preservation. The protocol is mandatory; deviations are themselves grounds for criminal and disciplinary action.

Custodial death triggers parallel obligations:

  • BNSS s. 196 (replacing CrPC s. 176(1A)) — a Judicial Magistrate, not the police, conducts the inquiry into every custodial death.
  • The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) must be informed within 24 hours; a magisterial inquiry report must reach the NHRC within 3 months.
  • D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal, (1997) 1 SCC 416 — the 11-point custodial-rights guidelines remain binding alongside the codified BNSS provisions.
  • The family is entitled to compensation as a constitutional remedy under Article 21 (Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa, (1993) 2 SCC 746).

When does it apply?

The protocol attaches the moment a death occurs in any of these circumstances:

  • Police encounter — death of an alleged criminal during operations.
  • Custodial death — death in police lock-up, judicial custody, or while otherwise in police charge.
  • Serious bodily injury inflicted by police during arrest or interrogation, regardless of survival.
  • Disappearance after the person was last seen in police custody.

What to Do After a Police Encounter Death or Custodial Death in India

The family's first 72 hours are decisive. Do these in order, in writing, with copies kept.

  • Insist on the FIR. Under the PUCL judgment, an FIR must be registered against the police officer(s) involved in the killing. Refusal can be challenged before the Magistrate under BNSS s. 175(3).
  • Demand the autopsy be videographed by two doctors — the PUCL protocol requires this.
  • File a complaint with the NHRC via nhrc.nic.in citing PUCL para 31, the 16-point guidelines.
  • For state cases, file in parallel with the State Human Rights Commission.
  • Approach the Magistrate for protection of evidence — preservation of weapons, bullet trajectory, CCTV.
  • File a writ petition in the High Court under Article 226 seeking court-monitored investigation by an independent agency (SIT or CBI).
  • Seek compensation under Article 21 — the State is liable; the Nilabati Behera precedent makes the constitutional remedy independent of any criminal trial.
  • If the deceased is a journalist, social activist, or member of a marginalised community, also engage the Press Council, National Commission for SC / ST, or Minorities Commission as relevant.

What should you NOT do?

  • Do not accept the body for cremation before a second post-mortem is requested if you suspect foul play. Once cremated, the most decisive evidence is lost.
  • Do not sign blank statements presented by police as "routine paperwork". Read every line.
  • Do not accept settlement offers before consulting a lawyer — early ex gratia payments are sometimes used to discourage criminal proceedings.
  • Do not rely solely on the State Police investigation. The PUCL framework expressly permits transfer to an independent agency, and High Courts routinely order it.

Common Questions

What is the encounter killings and custodial deaths right in India?

In People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. State of Maharashtra, (2014) 10 SCC 635, the Supreme Court laid down a 16-point binding protocol covering every police-encounter death — from FIR registration to mandatory magisterial inquiry to forensic preservation. The protocol is mandatory; deviations are themselves grounds for criminal and disciplinary action.Custodial death triggers parallel obligations:BNSS s. 196 (replacing CrPC s. 176(1A)) — a Judicial Magistrate, not the police, conducts the inquiry into every custodial death.The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) must be...

When does encounter killings and custodial deaths apply?

The protocol attaches the moment a death occurs in any of these circumstances:Police encounter — death of an alleged criminal during operations.Custodial death — death in police lock-up, judicial custody, or while otherwise in police charge.Serious bodily injury inflicted by police during arrest or interrogation, regardless of survival.Disappearance after the person was last seen in police custody.

What should the family do after a police encounter killing or a custodial death in India?

The family's first 72 hours are decisive. Do these in order, in writing, with copies kept.Insist on the FIR. Under the PUCL judgment, an FIR must be registered against the police officer(s) involved in the killing. Refusal can be challenged before the Magistrate under BNSS s. 175(3).Demand the autopsy be videographed by two doctors — the PUCL protocol requires this.File a complaint with the NHRC via nhrc.nic.in citing PUCL para 31, the 16-point guidelines.For state cases, file in parallel with the State Human Rights Commission.Approach the Magistrate for protection of evidence — preservation...

What mistakes should I avoid with encounter killings and custodial deaths?

Do not accept the body for cremation before a second post-mortem is requested if you suspect foul play. Once cremated, the most decisive evidence is lost.Do not sign blank statements presented by police as "routine paperwork". Read every line.Do not accept settlement offers before consulting a lawyer — early ex gratia payments are sometimes used to discourage criminal proceedings.Do not rely solely on the State Police investigation. The PUCL framework expressly permits transfer to an independent agency, and High Courts routinely order it.

You came here to know your rights — help someone else know theirs.

Support This Mission